On Saturday, I went to Newbury Street to get my hair cut, then wandered through the Public Gardens and Boston Common heading toward the financial district. I nearly decided to walk to Cambridge, which was my end destiantion, but thought, "Na, it's too hot, just browse a bit and then take the T."
So I went into Borders and - because I am who I am - browsing of course turned to buying. I've been on a weird reading cycle lately, going from chick lit to sci-fi to Harry Potter to mystery to whatever. I'm always on the lookout for good books. I found a variety of books that I wanted to get - Dennis Lehane's Mystic River (my friend Zabeth is in the movie, coming out soon!), two Jodi Picoults, a book on wedding ceremonies. One of the Jodi Picoults was part of a Buy Two, Get One Free deal off the various books on one rack, so Icouldn't pass that up and I piled on two more.
Anyway, I was looking at the books that I'd piled up and noticed a trend. (This is actually a trend that has long-since begun, but I'm only getting around to being pissed about it now.) I got seven books, of which six were fiction. Of those six, only one was a mass market paperback sized book; the others were all trade paperback.
When did that happen?
When I was a kid, everything was mass market; you didn't have the trade paperback size. And mass market paperbacks cost $4.99, maybe 5.99 if it was really thick. Now you're lucky if you can find one for under 7.99. And the trade paperbacks are worse, they're at least twelve bucks a pop. I just want to READ. I don't want to have to sell my soul to be able to buy books.
But more than the money thing, I just sorta miss mass market paperbacks. It used to be that everything I read was that size - and maybe it still would be, if my tastes hadn't changed a bit as I've grown older. Now, you can really only get sci-fi, mystery, and romance novels in mass market size, everything else is bigger. And that kind of stinks, because there's just a different feel to mass market paperbacks. It fits right in your hand, the print is tighter together, and the binding is tight. There's usually some weird emboss-y thing on the cover, so you can feel the letters of the title and the author's name rising under your hand. And there's crappy coming attraction-type ads for other books by the same publisher in the back, books that have little similarity to the book in your hand, but they're there nonetheless.
I miss that. In a trade paperback the only thing at the back of the book is the occasional reader's guide. It's just not the same.
On the bright side though, it means that someday all my mass market paperbacks will be collectors' items.