Stuff that's better in the UK:
* Street signs - clearer, bigger, and occasionally painted on the roads so you're sure to be in the proper lanes
* Chocolate - made with more milk, for creamy goodness
* Rude expressions - Sod off, mate!
* Old things - Castles in the US are of the pink plastic or bouncy variety. Stone ones are much cooler.
* Buses - I want double decker buses here in Boston, I really do.
* Movie scheduling - The theaters provide a time when the previews start, when the movie starts, and when the movie ends. Nice.
* The view from a train - rolling hills, farms, sheep... and (as my husband put it) "no poor people's back gardens!"
* Marks & Spencer - We don't have it here. We should.
Stuff that's better in the US:
* Plumbing - It's newer.
* Showers - They aren't electric. It's very odd to have to flip a switch on a shower that is outside the shower - or outside the ROOM. America also has better water pressure. (See: Plumbing.)
* Movie variiety - We have more multiplexes.
* Continuity - It was very weird, in London, to have Buckingham Palace next to The Gap (figuratively speaking). It's just a really weird amalgam of old and new and stuffy and wild and austere and commercialized.
I liked Scotland a lot better than London. London was congested and commercial and sort of cold... it was like Rome & New York combined, with this strange sense of history and significance surrounded by stores, stores, and more stores. I liked Edinburgh better... the sense of history there isn't as stuffy; it's castles (pillaging!) rather than palaces (being all courtly and that) and the city just integrates itself better. It's got gorgeous architecture and you just sort of walk around appreciating that, while also soaking up the fact that it's a cool city. In London, the Planet Hollywood and TGIFridays made it tougher for me to soak up the feel of the place.
So, in a nutshell... Scotland, wonderful; London, eh; Marks & Spencer's, huge thumbs up; American plumbing, BIG yay.
Comments (1)
Joy, I live in Edinburgh, but am a frequent visitor to Boston, so I see the differences as you did, but my observations were slightly different, in that we're still allowed to smoke in pubs...(not for long I hear !), our pub opening hours are much better, and we do have good historical preservation....some of the buildings in the High Street are 1000 years old.
On the plumbing front, I think if you stay in the touristy places, they are generally older plumbing, but in general people's houses are relatively new. Mind you, I've stayed in some not so nice places in Boston, but your property prices are so expensive !!! maybe I got the going rate.
I think that Boston / Edinburgh are very similar in a lot of respects,
1: Similar weather
2: Major Financial Centres
3: Main historical centers
4: Main centers of Academia
5: Centers of Computing
etc etc
I think that the Boston people are more friendly, but is that just because I'm a tourist ?
Posted by: Steve | December 11, 2003 3:21 PM